Now it seems, especially on the part of celebrities, "cool" to break your story through social media. That appears to be a much more 21st century way to get a story in circulation. It may even be a more controlled way to release the story, which may account for the growing appeal. You don't have to talk to a reporter and trust them to spin your message the way you want and when you want.
There is much more in the way of research questions. Some possibilities: Do stories broken through social media have more or less "legs?" Is the placeent of stories broken through social media better or worse? which social media venue is most popular for breaking news? Conversely,which is least popular? What types of stories are most likely to be broken through social media? How can we quantify the way social media has influenced the initiation of media-focused events? In other words, is it easier to organize a media-focused protest through social media than through traditional methods? I think there is even potential for a separate component to study the impact of social media on politics.

No comments:
Post a Comment